🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals participated in a collective professional network test this week following popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which content appear to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decline substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "assertive" language

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all participants experienced favorable results. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where the same posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."